Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @NateSilver538
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @NateSilver538
-
retweet for the information, favorite for the pun
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
HERE'S WHAT THE SPIKED SELZER POLL SAIDhttps://twitter.com/ClareMalone/status/1224485118271803392 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
The 15% rule is quite good as it's basically a form of ranked choice votinghttps://twitter.com/JeffreyToobin/status/1224381630392995844 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
No, seriously. Here are Bernie's best scenarios, for instance.pic.twitter.com/5hMy0ybVjU
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Here are 89 scenarios for what could happen after Iowa:https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/89-different-scenarios-for-what-things-could-look-like-after-iowa/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Nate Silver proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
This is almost all from that one satellite caucus in Florida and you should pay almost zero attention to it.
WhAt If KLoMeNtUm iS ReAL?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/03/us/elections/results-iowa-caucus-democrats.html …pic.twitter.com/7aB6QHsMQk
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I'm already regretting tweeting about satellite caucuses and will cut it out because I have a bunch of other work to do. Sort of fun though.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This seems not great for Biden? Nor for Bernie, but you wouldn't expect him to do well here and he seems to be doing good in the other satellite caucuses.https://twitter.com/ARobertsjourno/status/1224443166473932810 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
As people underestimate polling error in Iowa they underestimate the chances for some of the underdogs but they *also* underestimate the chances for a landslide win. eg. this PredictIt market showing only a 30% chance of a margin >7% (which isn't even that big) is probably off.pic.twitter.com/S7SFagzsAp
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
And.... it's 3PM so these are our final numbers for Iowa. Remember to criticize us if someone other than Sanders wins since we had Sanders as the most likely winner, and also to criticize us if Sanders wins since we had him at <50%.https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1224412117568229381 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We are also issuing district-by-district delegate forecasts in Iowa (as we are in all states), but they're somewhat boring as Iowa is relatively homogenous. Still, this from
@baseballot is worth your time on Iowa's political geography:https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/breaking-down-our-iowa-forecast-district-by-district/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Nate Silver proslijedio/la je Tweet
It’s possible there will be some variation in the results from one district to another—and understanding Iowa’s political geography will be important if you plan to follow the results tonight in real time.
@FiveThirtyEight has more:https://abcn.ws/2SfhkSUHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Note that we're forecasting the popular vote after realignment and not *state delegate equivalents*. State delegate equivalents may help the moderates more than Sanders and Warren. Here's more about what that all means:https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-iowas-three-different-votes-could-affect-who-wins/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sanders has emerged with a slightly clearer lead over Biden with the final few polls (although technically we're still holding the model open until 3pm). Still think people are underestimating the uncertainty a bit and neither a Buttigieg or Warren win would be at all shocking.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Iowa caucus winning chances: Sanders: 2 in 5 (41%) Biden: 1 in 3 (32%) Buttigieg: 1 in 7 (14%) Warren: 1 in 10 (10%) Klobuchar: 1 in 40 (2%)https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primary-forecast/iowa/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Taken in combination these things would tend to considerably increase the likelihood of a contested convention.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
What that would mean is some combination of: * Candidates less willing to drop out than usual * Smaller bounces from IA/NH * But perhaps larger bounces from NV/SC/beyond * Delayed reactions from party elites to things (e.g. Bernie's surge) that should have been evident earlier
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I wonder whether the relative lack of news coverage/buildup to the Iowa caucuses because of all the competing news stories could wind up sort of pushing back the timetable for the primaries.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.