So, just to recap: The House's impeachment efforts couldn't wait to adjudicate witness subpoenas, but they could stand to wait an extra three weeks after the vote, and now an acquittal won't be legitimate if the Senate doesn't supplement the House's work. Got it.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Here’s a fact. A senator asked a question yesterday. If the house didn’t want to take the time to subpoena witnesses... why should the senate ? It will take just as long. And freeze the senate. When the house would not have been frozen had they waited for subpoenas
-
That’s the design. Senate frozen = no judges are confirmed. Cocaine Mitch is about to go into overdrive when this farce is over.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They called plenty of witnesses. They just didnt give the answers she wanted.
-
This is exactly the case.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
They had 13 witnesses. I don't know what she is talking about
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yep, they won't stop at anything. When I walked out of the voting booth in 2016 after voting for Trump, I was extremely nervous about what I just did. I feel better and better about that decision every day since. November can't come soon enough!
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If this isn't a Trial, then what Nancy did isn't Impeachment!
-
She called witnesses and had documents. The jury is now deciding based on what SHE provided them.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.