@GarethChantler @thinkingpoker @NateMeyvis ...& that’s the same as misplaying because you like someone, only driven by a different emotion.
-
-
Replying to @I_Rapley
@GarethChantler
@thinkingpoker@NateMeyvis I see implicit understandings are basically collusion, but unilaterally misplaying, I dunno..?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thinkingpoker
@thinkingpoker what about not busting that player for other reasons - it’s hellmuth and you’re scared he’ll rant at you, say?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thinkingpoker
@thinkingpoker is it unethical? It's structurally exactly the same as not busting your pal, only the motivation is different.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @I_Rapley
@I_Rapley@thinkingpoker The difference in structure: what you're motivated by (is it "team EV" or not?).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis@thinkingpoker maybe, anyway, thanks for taking time to explain it to the slow kid.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @I_Rapley
@I_Rapley@thinkingpoker FWIW I take your point. We don't have very clear criteria that capture all the cases perfectly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis@I_Rapley@thinkingpoker regardless of the ethics, larger point is for new players to know, others are often working together.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@PieFarmer @I_Rapley @thinkingpoker Indeed. And a lot of "fish behavior" is naturally collusive.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.