It's amazing how much "advanced" poker strategy writing boils down to concepts I read in Theory of Poker almost 20 years ago.
-
-
Replying to @MattGlassman312
@MattGlassman312 Or: it's amazing how hard it is to really *get* and apply what's in Theory of Poker?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis for sure. I think I've done 5-6 close readings of it, and 25+ total! and I always learn something or see something in new light.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattGlassman312
@MattGlassman312 Also, I think I should have studied that book more carefully. I have subway reading for the week.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis I think 7CSFAP is closer to my heart, but TOP is clearly the greatest. Looks like I've got Christmas vacation reading!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattGlassman312
@MattGlassman312 I think I learned more from 7CSFAP--but then it's a much bigger book.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis hard to compare. 7CSFAP is how to beat a game, with indirect side benefit of global concepts. TOP is almost all the latter.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattGlassman312
@NateMeyvis 7CSFAP works for people uninterested in theory. My dad, for instance, loved it, but thought TOP was am academic waste of time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MattGlassman312 Yep.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.