Apparently collecting rake didn't create an obligation to run a fair & secure tournament. Won't be returning to @BorgataPoker any time soon.
-
-
Replying to @thinkingpoker
@thinkingpoker@BorgataPoker how would you have handled it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @elgatonegro99
@elgatonegro99 Refunds for affected players should have come out@BorgataPoker's pocket, not the pockets of the final 27.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thinkingpoker
@thinkingpoker@elgatonegro99 Do you think@BorgataPoker was negligent, or that the house is generally responsible for making players whole?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis@BorgataPoker Strong presumption of negligence whenever there is cheating. Collecting rake incurs obligation to ensure fair game3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @thinkingpoker
@thinkingpoker @BorgataPoker If the house had to reimburse for all breaches of fairness and security, there wouldn't be public games.
1:21 PM - 17 Apr 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.