Cool post by @QuantPoker. But I don't believe that the utility of a $8.9MM prize is only twice that of a $80K prize. http://goo.gl/dv9bM
-
-
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis Thanks, Nate. Yeah, looking back, hard to be happy with that tail of the utility function fit. Will have to revisit eventually.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuantPoker
@QuantPoker I was slightly unfair by not giving all the hypothetical details. And I'd love to read future work of yours!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis
@NateMeyvis@thinkingpoker PS Your show has become the only podcast that I wait to listen to until it can get my full attention. Great stuff1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Replying to @QuantPoker
@QuantPoker @thinkingpoker That's very kind! Glad you like the show.
4:03 PM - 9 May 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.