Lib reax to VP: those concern-trolling are actually gleeful, those gleeful are actually nervous, and those who think it wont matter r right.
@MattGlassman312 So you disagree with Nate Silver (who thinks it's a high-variance move)?
-
-
@NateMeyvis Yes. Most of Rom's win paths require econ fundamentals stay sour or worse. Unlikely to sqeak by on policy/personel/etc. (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateMeyvis Outside of Palin-eseque incompetence, marginal VP effect is vanishingly small. See http://wp.me/pVLr3-oMThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateMeyvis Doesn't mean it wasn't higher variance than other picks. But to have substantive effect, you'd need a lot higher variance, IMO.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NateMeyvis Wrong link before. My VP thoughts from a while back: http://wp.me/pVLr3-P0 -
@MattGlassman312 Interesting! Thanks very much.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.