I agree with this, but I think the scope of Kindle’s revolution is limited by the learning barrier for using it really effectively. For fact retention/retrieval, I think naive paper book may beat naive Kindle use. Physical cues are just so intuitive.
A reply to @ShakeelHashim: Why the Kindle *has* been revolutionary for me.https://www.natemeyvis.com/writing/how-i-use-the-kindle/ …
-
-
-
Dog-ear pages? Have a pen handy? Take notes on a separate pad? However intuitive physical cues are, I've never found an actual end-to-end process that works for me. ("Backups always work; it's restores that fail.")
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
really enjoyed this! Agree with you on most points — my stack is Kindle/Readwise/Roam instead of Anki but it gives a similar effect that's extremely valuable to me. #9 is an interesting thought too, and I think you're probably right!
-
Interesting how different people divide the space of PKM functions. For me Anki is better for retention and DEVONthink for retrieval / search / storage, and those are what I care about. (FWIW I’ve tried both Roam and Readwise. Liked both, but that’s not the stack for me.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.