Git makes a lot more sense thought of as a content-addressable filesystem the designer of which had "absolutely no interest in creating a traditional SCM system." (Not intended as snark! It's the real literal answer to a lot of my "why the heck is this like this?" questions.)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
And all of them have *some interpretation* with respect to version control. But thinking of them as filesystem operations first helps me keep in mind that some are more and less useful from the point of view of version control. [2/N]
It's an interface issue, I think. It's not just that the internals are filesystem internals; it's that in a lot of ways the interface is a filesystem interface, not a version control one. So, translating between a VCS job I want to do and a Git command is often nontrivial. [3/N]
-
-
My instincts as a user of good software is to assume that if I'm doing too much of that kind of translation, I'm using the software wrong or misunderstanding it. Not so with Git, perhaps. [4/4]
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.