He was one of the very biggest influences on me as a student of ancient philosophy. I kept the Burnyeat/Levett _Theaetetus_ to hand through my dissertation (which centered on that dialogue). The harder I studied the dialogue, the more I saw the wisdom of his notes. [2/N]
-
-
Show this thread
-
...And I'm saying that even though I chose to spend years writing on that subject partly because I thought the existing literature was importantly lacking in its treatment of it. [3/N]
Show this thread -
People don't talk much about "Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion," which if memory serves was a conference talk that became part of an edited volume. But it's essential for anyone who wants to think seriously about Greek epistemology... [4/N]
Show this thread -
...or at least the corner of it having to do with math, Plato's Republic, and the way Aristotle is and isn't a Platonist. The issues he raises fundamentally informed my understanding of Plato. And, again, that's a very very small part of Burnyeat's corpus. [5/N]
Show this thread -
Burnyeat was not Plato, but studying him is in some ways analogous: brilliant always, delightful everywhere, always clever but always always serious. Rachel Barney (characteristically) gets Burnyeat right in her review of his collected works : https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/explorations-in-ancient-and-modern-philosophy-volumes-1-2/ … [6/N]
Show this thread -
I could go on, and perhaps I'll have time to do so elsewhere (though other people will surely have much more informed things to say about him). But, for now, RIP. [7/7]
Show this thread -
P.S.: "Plato on Why Mathematics is Good for the Soul" is one of the very best papers I read during my Ph.D. I still think about it often. [8/7]
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.