Also, this isn't at all original to me, but it's quite striking: thinking in terms of a distinction between command and insert mode has changed, for the better, the way I think about writing (and not just writing code). [7/N]
-
Show this thread
-
Alternatively phrased: If you're a writer, it's nice to make more explicit to yourself how much metaphysics is encoded in traditional methods of word processing. [8/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Finally, the case of writing software (IDEs and so on) is a neat case study in technological progress. I'd love to read more about it if anyone has suggestions. [9/9]
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @wycats
I didn’t understand 3/4 of this, but the last point about writing and the word processor seems absurdly ridiculous important.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattGlassman312
So, I've been mulling this over for a while. If I were to expand on the thing you highlighted specifically, I'd say: Why, exactly, does the average person use Word instead of writing freehand? (1) There's the advantages of a computer: saving, sharing, etc. [1/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
(2) Many people can type faster than they can write. (3) There are certain superpowers you get. I think a lot of people overrate (2) and underrate (3). I'm specifically thinking of copy/paste and find[/replace]. [2/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
It's a remarkable thing, when you think about it: you can put text into a magical area where you can retrieve it later. You can edit a bunch of things at once. These are intuitive enough to be popular but require thinking of the program not just as a virtual tablet. [3/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
What other magic might you want out of a word processor? Since you aren't constrained by the physics of hand movement, you'd want to rethink "motion." What if it were equally easy to move the cursor (i) back one character, (ii) back to the previous whitespace, [4/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
(iii) back to the last occurrence of "Jefferson," (iv) back to the last instance of whatever word is under your cursor right now, (v) back to the last blank line, or (iv) [any other reasonable thing you can think of? Many people use (ii) (CTRL+left in various apps). [5/N}
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
You will not be surprised to learn that all of these, and many more, are out-of-the-box, one- or two-keystroke commands in Vim (and other such text editors). (OK, (iii) is two keystrokes plus the text you're searching for.) [6/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You already knew that "power user" text editors exist. But perhaps it helps to think of them as tools for taking all the ways that Word gently breaks you out of the metaphysics of pen and paper (e.g., what's close to what?), and going to eleven. [7/N]
-
-
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
Now imagine similar augmentations for copy/pasting, deleting, and everything else you can do in Word but can't with pen and paper (including at the meta-level: there's a one-keystroke "repeat the last command I gave, whatever that is"). That's what modern editors give you. [8/N]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NateMeyvis @MattGlassman312
What I find interesting and revealing is that getting all these superpowers is that I find them so much more valuable when I'm writing computer code than when I'm writing English (though it's useful in the latter case too). I have only partial explanations here. [9/9]
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.