“There's no reason for the National Archives to ever digitally alter a historic photograph," Rice University historian Douglas Brinkley said. "If they don't want to use a specific image, then don't use it. But to confuse the public is reprehensible.”https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/national-archives-exhibit-blurs-images-critical-of-president-trump/2020/01/17/71d8e80c-37e3-11ea-9541-9107303481a4_story.html …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ministry of Truth 2020.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, it’s the same way Russians would handle it
-
Precisely, and that is the point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Government agency attempting to re write history. This has been done before...
-
Yes, Trump’s inauguration crowd pictures.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How disappointing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Horrible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Joseph Stalin likes to alter official government portraits and photographs, too.
-
But Parnas has real unaltered photos.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.