But wouldn't that poison all the people living downstream? And increase climate change which destabilizes nations? Seems bad.
Including the Stream Protection Rule, which could destroy tens of thousands of mining jobs and put up to 64% of our coal reserves off limitshttps://twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/824270394295205889 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GOPLeader@WSJ And poison the streams. Why don't you care about poisoned water?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
coal is dead. Natural gas is cheaper, more efficient than, and more readily available.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GOPLeader@WSJ Coal? Really? I see the@NatResources really thinks outside the box, really great job. Foward thinking at is best#clownsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the inevitable argument frm a US gov owned by big corp polluters JOBS new jobs in renewables are here
@POTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yeah, who need clean drinking water? besides every life form on the planet
#getseriousThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RepGosar putting coal reserves off limits sounds like a good thingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.