But... That just supports the point. It's fine for people to have weapons to protect themselves, when those weapons couldn't destroy the lives of tens or hundreds of people in seconds. Now that we have weapons of literal mass destruction, there should be different laws
Police. Law enforcement. But if there was a need for education and licensing and mental health checks, etc, federally, and actually enforced, he wouldn't have killed anyone. At all. And if automatic weapons were illegal for citizens, he would have killed maybe one. Not more.
-
-
Automatic weapons ARE illegal.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What? You asked who shot the shooter. I was actually answering.... The "armed adults" who stopped him were police.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
For the record, no, actually. I'm a pescatarian. Also, this is silly and irrelevant. And an assumption. It's not usually wise to base your debates, arguments, and logic on mere assumption.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.