I think here, AI might just be making a problem that already existed worse. Online HR IT systems have for over a decade been used to filter applications (and likely with bad 2nd and 3rd order effects). AI likely a machine that is trusted even more without any merit on efficacy.
-
-
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
Capitalism requires a reserve army of labour to perpetuate itself; our responsibility is to destroy it.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
I may be wrong here, but are they really pretending that predicting the fit of a candidate can be formulated as a pattern recognition problem, with no reasoning involved? Even if it's been tested for bias, does merely saying "I" vs. "we" an indicator of teamwork abilities?
-
Yeah, some of these tests seem really bogus. And then they claimed it was more "objective". This is the kind of attitude towards AI that needs to end. It is not some objective determinant, it's a reflection of your priorities and goals (e.g. connecting "we" frequency to skill).
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
So sad
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
I hope so. I currently kick ass at my job, am thriving, and cannot imagine doing anything else. My app was auto-rejected by the computer. I called to see if there was anything I could do diffrerently next time to avoid that, and they were like "eh fuck it you get an interview."
-
My guess their attitude is having one more get an interview is much better than a potential lawsuit. So, I bet they do this for anyone who calls. How many get rejected and don't call? I suspect the sample of people that question their rejection by calling is very biased.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Let’s ask Jeff and Pedro for comment
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
From what was presented in the article and a cursory look at what's available to see on their website, it looks like they use a battery of psych evals. I see relative numerosity is one of their tests using non-symbolic. That's a numerical ability test.
-
Some of these are known to be biased, although I can't remember precisely off the top of my head. Many can be "cheated" by training and so, it seems like a very bad idea to use them. I imagine "job test prep" classes to do this training could pop up soon (similar to SAT prep)
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.