![◼◼◼[̕D̴A̡T͘͟͡Ą͠ ͘E͢͠X̀͜͝P̶̨͠UN̡͜͝G͠E͏͝D]̛̀͘◼◼◼](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/831624243959967744/yOtJ5xtZ_normal.jpg)
Show this thread
Surprise, surprise, Wikileaks didn't leak the next email in this chain from the OPCW questioning why Ian Henderson was creating rogue reports. This email also quite clearly contradicts "Alex's" claim that Henderson was in the FFM.pic.twitter.com/qcJkAyXe9W
-
-
-
On that note: there is also a document from a 1 hr meeting with toxicologists questioning whether the symptoms were consistent with chlorine. However, there were further consultations in Sep & Oct 2018. Wikileaks is selectively leaking docs it thinks supports its narrative.pic.twitter.com/CRfAM0B6xQ
Show this thread -
If Wikileaks weren't trying to push an agenda, they would just dump everything they have and be done with it. I suspect they have a lot more of this, but they won't dump it in one go. They know exactly what it'll show...
Show this thread -
An organisation struggling to piece together a hugely complex event in the middle of a conflict, where at least two countries are deeply invested in obscuring the murder of scores of civilians. So go on Wikileaks, prove me wrong: dump it all. Now.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Surprises me why the OPCW haven't mentioned this already.
-
They kind of did.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They leaked a whole series on Russian surveillance contractors just a couple of years ago.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It did, but it didn't contain the next email in this chain, which presumably answers these questions.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.