I’m really glad Olivia is covering NCII and looking at solutions.
She was one of only a couple of journalists who covered the 2017 FB pilot from the perspective of victims (the other being @kateconger). Most of the media just enjoyed posting snarky hot takes.https://twitter.com/oliviasolon/status/1196422970127867905 …
One difference I can see: If people send you a hash and it matches a non-nude, you don't know whether it was an accidental hit or a hostile attempt at censoring the non-nude (in which case you can penalize them). If they send you the actual nude, you know it was accidental.
-
-
I'm sure Facebook doesn't like to talk about retaliation, but the ability to retaliate changes the whole dynamics of their interaction with users.
-
Of course this assumes the "hash" matching is not only inexact in a technical sense (which it has to be to match images with minor alterations) but produces lots of false negatives and false positives. I bet that's the case, though; seems like a very hard problem to solve well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
