It's remarkable the extent to which every single actor in this ordeal is proving your point. Literally one guy is pointing out harassment, and a whole campaign is mobilizing around a conspiracy theory to discredit you and drive more clicks to their @YouTube channels.
-
-
Replying to @dan_something @gaywonk and
Crowder is not harassing him. Making mocking videos isn't harassment. Harassment is calling people bigots without evidence, attempting to get them silenced because you don't like their voice and giving constant death threats. He discredits himself. No one need help him.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NThompson_3 @dan_something and
If you hold a position of power and influence mocking someone over their race and sexuality is harassment. Or you may not want to call it that. Sure go with mushu if you want. What matters is he is getting harassed over it and Crowder refuses responsibility despite causing it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtisanMage @dan_something and
Crowder does not hold a position of power. He hosts a Youtube show. Maza works for a billion dollar corporation Who has power here? Maza didn't seem to mind much until pride month. He even mocks Crowder at one point saying "Learn to bottom for Christ's sake" Hypocrite much?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NThompson_3 @dan_something and
Crowder has a nearly 4 million subscribers on his youtube channel. He holds far more influance than a single journalist what ever company they may be working for. Deciding when to talk about it is up to him. He simply vented on twitter about the blatantly obvious harassment he..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtisanMage @dan_something and
Ah so here we go, you equate subscribers with corporate power. Funny how that works. Crowder is funded by his fans. Maza is funded by a billion dollar corporation. He isn't a "single journalist". He doesn't make his videos without help. You are distorting reality.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NThompson_3 @ArtisanMage and
He did not simply vent on Twitter he started a campaign to deplatform someone he didn't like. In the process he harmed an entire community while still pretending to be a victim. Again, he didn't have a problem until it was politically convenient to have one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NThompson_3 @dan_something and
He did not start a campaign at all. He didn't even contact youtube himself. He made a post venting on twitter and other people directed youtube to him. He didn't initiate it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtisanMage @NThompson_3 and
And people who did attack crowder following that only did cause they saw mazas video and felt symphaty for him. Unless you wanna make a claim that he has a responsibility to people following him you have to grant that same responsibility to crowder.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtisanMage @NThompson_3 and
And no. If you wanna make the claim that not being able to use a site big as youtube is cencorship then you don't get to use the argument that people can just be mean for the sake of it and they should grow a thick skin. If you gonna claim this the modern...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He isn't being mean for the sake of being mean that is the point. He makes fun of Maza while breaking down his arguments He refers to him as a lispy queer, a sprite and a few other very mild slurs. He doesn't call him a filthy faggot now does he? The jokes are not the content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.