If you can find a specific statement there that is inaccurate, I will happily correct it. Right now you are portraying disdain because I said something that you would be afraid to say. I posed some questions to you, and they were sincere questions. On Broszat & Wormser-Migot?
-
-
And what about those motives that you say D'Souza intentionally avoided mentioning in his article for Breitbart?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And I really do want to know whether you have taken account of the fact that Yehuda Bauer said in early 2017 that less than half a million non-Jews died in the camps, which is an enormous reduction from what used to be said. https://www.jta.org/2017/01/31/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I would speculate that Beorn is afraid to engage with you because 1) he knows through his wide reading on the subject that you are substantially correct on "the Holocaust" (i.e., that it has been fantastically exaggerated), and 2) his income depends on pretending otherwise.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
I don't need to speculate that you are a pedophile because you were convicted of possession of child pornography. I don't need to speculate about your racism and antisemitism because I've read your site/Twitter feed. (Great supporters,
@NSWorldview!) http://bit.ly/2HTX7yy pic.twitter.com/VO6THs3aLy
2 replies 5 retweets 22 likes -
Again, Beorn proves he won't address the issues raised by his critics, and instead just tried to convince his readers that they're "bad people." Not an argument.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I don't really think I need to convince anyone that you are a bad person. You are a:
pedophile,
a racist,
a homophobe,
an antisemite, AND
a Holocaust Denier.
I'd say you're checking all the right boxes for "bad people."pic.twitter.com/g6eJ50f0Uq
5 replies 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @waitmanb @kevin_a_strom and
Kevin says you are refusing to engage him. You didn't block him. Though he blocked me. I'm not sure
@kevin_a_strom understands what refusing to engage means.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scottkernest @waitmanb and
@waitmanb just had an article in WaPo that advocated "showing the receipts" but I asked him to show receipts for some historical assertions and he doesn't want to show them! It seems that he didn't think through what "public engagement" would involve. Kevin merely seconded.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NSWorldview @scottkernest
Let me put this plainly.If you are a racist, antisemite, and a Holocaust Denier, you.are.not.worth.engaging. I'm not going to convince you. I usually engage to present the facts to interested Twitter users.They don't need proof the
#Holocaust happened. So, you don't get a boost.pic.twitter.com/USe6v9WARE3 replies 2 retweets 12 likes
"I'm not going to convince you. I usually engage to present the facts to interested Twitter users.They don't need proof...." You deliver "The Truth" to people who don't question. That is not the usual attitude of an historian, & you are not one. The Holocaust is a religion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.