Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD) on Twitter

It’s encouraging to see some attention being paid to this - finally. At the same time discouraging that even more precise information has been mostly ignored for years. The best satellite resolution is stated as 25 meters (~82 feet) but

@TXsharon

has been pinpointing emissions.

Quote Tweet

Jim Baird

@JimBair62221006

Aug 15, 2021

New methane dataset reveals more big oil lies- "finds some significant discrepancies between expected emissions from the major oil and gas producers, based on their disclosures and policies, and how they are performing in reality" #ClimateEmergency reuters.com/article/emissi

Show this thread

1

4

13

Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD)

@NSVann

Aug 17, 2021

Her FLIR camera has picked up methane venting from fossil fuel operations at the exact source - seemingly forever Cameras like hers are expensive & traveling the Texas shale region has taken time & dedication. But it can negate the ownership questions raised

@JimBair62221006

2

6

Replying to

and

It seems like

would be funded by an @EPAgov that really cared about climate change.

1

3

Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD)

Replying to

and

It would be nice if they even noticed her work and incorporated it into their actions Big projects that include satellites & computers will probably always get more attention. I know she’s not in this for personal recognition - it’s just that her data is so precise & available!

2

3

Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD)

Replying to

Here’s more information on the undercount of atmospheric methane - and another way to trace leaks back to specific companies: look at their public filings lostleaks.csail.mit.edu

4:06 PM · Aug 17, 2021

Conversation