Opens profile photo
Follow
Click to Follow NSVann
Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD)
@NSVann
Retired Wall Street Attorney & whistleblower; President Safe Energy Rights Group; Yale Law '83; Keep uranium & fossil fuels in the ground not in our air & water
New YorkJoined November 2009

Nancy S Vann, Esq. (JD)’s Tweets

🧵 Busy week. A health forum here addressed the dangers of dumping nuclear fuel pool water directly into the Hudson River just north of NY City The Hudson is a tidal river that’s used for fishing & drinking water both upstream & down.
Replying to and
Of course, nuclear proponents will claim that all lessons of the past are wrong and everything will become completely different in the future. Hell, even Bill Gates and Warren Buffet can't afford a really small nuclear reactor without DOE paying half of the bill...
2
. Seems there weren’t any deaths this time But that’s not always the outcome with careless handling of even small amounts of radioactive material We need to stop making more nuclear waste while attempting to ‘idiot proof’ what we already have
1
Show this thread
Can you imagine what would happen if there were that many waste shipments over that period of time? Accidents are inevitable. If a tiny capsule of cesium-137 couldn’t be safely shipped, how could this enormous amount of radioactive waste be transported?
1
1
Show this thread
A very interesting read: “Small modular reactors won’t achieve economies of manufacturing scale, won’t be faster to construct, forego efficiency of vertical scaling, won’t be cheaper… They’ve existed since the 1950s and they aren’t any better now than they were then.”
Quote Tweet
.@mzjacobson Another analysis of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) looks at the trajectory for implementation The AP1000 line of reactors (like Vogtle & Summers) were “supposed to do most of what small modular reactors are supposed to do” They didn’t cleantechnica.com/2023/01/18/the
3
. Another analysis of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) looks at the trajectory for implementation The AP1000 line of reactors (like Vogtle & Summers) were “supposed to do most of what small modular reactors are supposed to do” They didn’t
6
44
. So, let’s just stop making more nuclear waste. We already have too much of it - and no solution for storing it for the hundreds of thousands of years it will remain dangerous. Close existing nuke plants as quickly as possible & ‘just say no’ to SMRs:
Quote Tweet
Why Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Are Not a Climate Fix youtu.be/ojWCvxKzUgk @naomioreskes @DavidSchlissel @ieefa_institute @nirsnet @dorfman_p @ProfStrachan @ChristianOnRE @BrianVad @AmoryLovins @CKemfert @HJFell @EWGnetwork @NSVann @HeidiHutner @Suzwarto @ssteingraber1
2
2
Show this thread
.🧵⬆️ In case you’re wondering how shipping radioactive waste might affect you:
Quote Tweet
If you live within 50 miles of almost any train line in the US, you might be a good candidate for evacuation Frequent derailments make it an almost certainty that at least some of the proposed shipments will have accidents. And not just the fires we’ve seen. Invisible radiation.
Show this thread
1
2
Show this thread
.🧵⬆️ If you think shipping the highly radioactive waste to CIS sites might be safer on trains, you might have forgotten some pretty spectacular rail accidents in the past few years:
Quote Tweet
Let’s not start shipping highly radioactive ‘spent’ nuclear fuel by train. It’s not possible to evacuate a necessary 50 mile radius in a lot of places. Fiery freight train derailment prompts Canada to enact 30-day speed limit - ABC News - via @ABC abcn.ws/2vUBpGt
1
2
Show this thread
. To give you an idea of just how many towns & people would be affected by the proposed radioactive waste shipments, it would take one or more shipments every day for 50 years. Here’s more info on just how much waste there is:
Quote Tweet
At Regional Decommissioning Forum in Montrose, NY today, a little info on what transporting nuclear waste from plant sites to interim or permanent storage would entail:
Image
2
1
Show this thread
. A radioactive gauge smaller than a penny is missing in Australia Authorities warn being within 3 feet of it for 1 hour is equivalent to 10 x-rays (1 day = 240 x-rays) But tell me again how moving used nuclear fuel across country is “completely safe” thedailybeast.com/emergency-warn
Door signs in a hospital warn people not to enter an area used for x-rays and tell women who are (or might be) pregnant to inform technologists before getting an x-ray due to demonstrated fetal damage from the radiation exposure.
2
5
Show this thread
A bit behind so just reading Heather Cox Richardson’s Jan. 25th letter including her review of antitrust changes Biden led the committee that killed Reagan’s nomination of Bork to the Supreme Court. His reversal of Bork’s antitrust views is even better. heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/january-25-2
Quote Tweet
Replying to @NSVann and @matthewstoller
.@Powers4People @NewYorkStateAG While many remember him as a failed Supreme Court nominee or a Richard Nixom hatchet man, Robert Bork’s most lasting influence was undermining antitrust law & enforcement. Fortunately people are ready to reverse that: mlexwatch.com/articles/13146
1
The cancer clusters that were traced by local monitoring folks after the Three Mile Island disaster have taken a horrible toll on individuals & families The fetal abnormalities & other health effects that are higher in children are also lifelong tragedies long after plants close
1
Show this thread
. As Dr. Caldicott points out, nuclear plants are cancer factories whose damage lasts long after they’re shut. Nuke proponents who claim low fatalities from plants aren’t just inaccurate on that score, but the idea that deaths are the only relevant effect is seriously unethical.
1
1
Show this thread
Tritium is another problem - particularly because, as H3O it becomes a part of any water source At the Indian Point nuke plant it has leaked into the ground water & the Hudson River for decades That’s a ‘tidal’ river that is used by some local communities for their water supply
1
1
Show this thread
Strontium 90 is next on her list of cancer causing elements that produces bone cancer. Plutonium is another one with a very long half-life (half a million years) that causes lung cancer. It also causes fetal deformities.
1
1
Show this thread
Dr. Hellen Caldicott is now speaking at a webinar on the health dangers of nuclear plants. One of her slides lists all of the radioactive elements released in the plants during Cesium which attacks calcium has a half life of many years and can destroy muscle & cause cancer.
1
5
Show this thread
“Nuclear power is like fighting world hunger with caviar, it’s like using the most expensive option when there are far more plentiful and nutritious options available.” Prof Benjamin Sovacool, lead author for IPCC on climate change mitigation between now and 2050.
212
1,188
. We’ve been unable to raise reclamation bond requirements for oil & gas wells to the true cost of plugging them because there wouldn’t be any new wells if those costs were incurred up front. The current fracked gas business model is to pay executives big salaries & go bankrupt.
Quote Tweet
. The ‘bankruptcy option’ for fracking companies distorts that market, allowing many costs to be externalized to the public. No drilling should be permitted without a sufficient set-aside for capping depleted wells. Of course there would be no new wells if that were required.
Show this thread
5