It is coming. Duh. And no f’ing crying. This shit is on Mitch.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree, Biden should answer the question. But given the 180 that Sen. Graham and others did on nominations during election years, the GOP isn’t in a strong position to lecture on transparency.
-
And yes, I get the Senate/POTUS same-party argument. It’s a reasonable argument. But it’s not what Graham and others said at the time. They made blanket statements: no nominations close to an election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you think Republicans are the special chosen ones who can appoint judges? Hypocrites.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The membership number of the court has changed over the years. You know that, right? Of course you do. Know why it happens? Minorities gain out-sized control, it's a way for the majority to exercise it's constitutional control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lolol whats the point??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don’t they just take the Republican tack and just say they’re against it, and then completely go back on their word and do it anyway because “that’s politics” and “they can”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.