He gave her a Friday deadline to submit testimony if she intends to appear.https://n.pr/2D9yf4Z
-
-
Show this thread
-
Grassley responded to her request for an FBI investigation as a first step, saying that the agency already completed a background check of Kavanaugh and it is now the Senate’s job to address any new issues.
Show this thread -
“It is not the FBI’s role to investigate a matter such as this,” Grassley wrote.
Show this thread -
He offered to dispatch committee investigators to interview Ford “at a time and place convenient to her.” Grassley reiterated the committee’s offer to allow Ford to testify in a closed session.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I find it interesting that two people who are under extreme pressure are reduced to One who is an " exemplary " person . And the other ?? Oh well she's only a woman , we can proceed without her. Same old same old.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Grassley is full of it. If the White House would request it, the FBI would investigate these new allegations. Grassley wants to PREVENT any new facts from being introduced to keep it a he said/she said.
-
What part of, DOJ says the sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh "does not involve any potential federal crime" for the FBI to investigate, don't you understand.
-
The FBI does background checks. They do them in response to a requesting agency. For Supreme Court nominees, that is the WH. The FBI can't start an investigation independent of that request without a potential federal crime. They can if the WH requests additional BG check.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Know what though? Dr. Ford doesn’t have to do what they say. Women are done playing this ridiculous game. We’re just done.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
so Kavanaugh is guilty--just like the Duke Lacrosse team was?
-
So she wasn’t assaulted like the kids in the church, the actors with Harvey, the co workers of Lauer or O’Reilly. I can keep going. So why is it the norm is to support the accused when they are more often than not proven guilty. It’s a tactic to keep other victims from speaking
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rep senators, those sworn to uphold Constitution, are giving her 6 days to prepare to sit next to her attacker & publicly testify, because of a fake timeline? Are they still asking for other people to question her cause they don want to look bad. Yes, they do suck that much!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What BS....Gop Smear tactics in full bloom
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Infuriating! One would think that the
#SCOTUS seat would be taken more serious. That an investigation would transpire to ensure the best possible candidate is seated in the highest seat in our courts. This is not Justice this is BS!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Women are getting his confirmation rammed down our throats. And yes, I used that reference specifically.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Securely send us news tips: