Unless something weird happens this strike isn’t going to linger in the public imagination. Same as last year.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's just interesting that Trump accused Obama for launching airstrikes for that reason
-
Sort of. I take it as further proof--and we already have a lot--that Trump's not knowledgeable about this stuff nor a strategic thinker, and said whatever criticism he could think of to oppose Obama.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You’re way too sensical, Gross Man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank You!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump treating it as a PR opportunity rather than part of a humanitarian strategy is a big deal. Ignoring the bombing of Syrians by Assad using conventional weapons is just as wrong, yet nothing uttered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rachel Maddow did make a good point, though, when she said that even the appearance of distraction diminishes the US’ capacity to lead in this situation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Check out how many new weapon systems were "successfully" used... Hooray, weapon industry for the win!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair, Fox & Friends said "launch strikes, it'll be a distraction" that morning, & he's acted on f&f Ideas before
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when has Trump showed any concern for Syrians? France & England may have leaders who care. I assure u Drumpf doesn't
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.