This divide is yet another instance of what I've decided is the most fundamental principle that defines conservative vs liberal politics. Conservatives think policy should be based on how things "should be". Liberals think policy should be based on how things actually are. 1/
-
-
-
Apply it to any social issue. Making birth control available to teenagers. Conservatives: "teenagers shouldn't be having sex." Liberals: "they will anyway". Pick an issue. Works every time. /
-
Apply it to any social issue: Raising the age limit to purchase a firearm. Liberals: "Teenagers shouldn't be able to get guns." Conservatives: "They will anyway."
-
Backwards. People "shouldn't" shoot up schools. They do anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The constitution requires apportioning House seats to states counting all residents. States have the right to redistrict legislative and congressional districts according to citizen count.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Knownothingism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not surprising
@AriFleischer was the press secretary during George W & is still marketing fake news. Still remember when the another George W press secretary@DanaPerino didn't know about the Cuban Missile Crisis. Both need#historylesson#civicsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would guess the latter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You've failed to explain why it's inherently wrong for the census to ask ALL residents whether they're U.S. citizens, so they can apportion representation accordingly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.