The evidence is clear: America has a problem with white nationalist terrorism.
As @peterwsinger has pointed out, more Americans were killed in the last decade by white nationalist terrorism than Islamic terrorism.
Past time we took it seriously as a national security problem.
7/x
-
Show this thread
-
Trump has directed national counterterrorism resources away from white nationalism and focused them entirely on jihadism. He has downplayed or ignored the former while playing up the latter. But both threaten Americans, and both deserve counterterrorism attention. 8/x
3 replies 44 retweets 88 likesShow this thread -
The Austin bomber was a young white man and the two people he killed were both black, suggesting it may have been racially-motivated terrorism. Perhaps he was part of the white nationalist movement. But we do not have sufficient evidence yet to reach that conclusion. 9/x
2 replies 21 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Just because other people misuse the word terrorist to fearmonger with the worst form of identity politics doesn't mean you should too. Even (especially) if the person misusing the word is the president of the United States. (END)
7 replies 28 retweets 79 likesShow this thread -
UPDATE: Police say the Austin bomber left a 25-minute video confession on his cell phone. Describes bombs' construction in detail, but they still don't know his motive. That indicates it's probably not terrorism. If he was trying to make a political point, he'd do it there. u1/x
4 replies 12 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
Charleston church shooter described hoping to ignite race war in online videos. San Bernardino attackers pledged allegiance to ISIS on Facebook. Bin Laden formally declared war. McVeigh wrote letters. Because their attack is political, terrorists want people to know why. u2/x
3 replies 9 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
Austin bomber took the time to make a 25-minute video, but didn't include a political statement. When it comes to political views, we know little. Reports say he wrote a blog post in 2012 opposing gay marriage and abortion. That tells us nothing about why he sent the bombs. u3/x
3 replies 12 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
More could emerge. But based on what we know now, Austin bomber was a serial killer, not a terrorist. The distinction matters because strategies to stop them are different. Politics plays a role in terrorism, which means it is, in part, a political/national security problem. u4/x
4 replies 14 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
If you're pointing out that many, including Trump, would jump to conclusions and incorrectly label the Austin bomber a terrorist if he were Muslim, you're right. And that's a problem. But the solution isn't incorrectly labeling him a terrorist because he's not Muslim (END UPDATE)
13 replies 20 retweets 90 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Hi long time listener, first time caller. If an event is classified as terrorism does that also change the response by the government? Such as must homeland security become involved because it is a terrorist attack?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nice intro. There are formal legal definitions, which can differ from the analytical definition I'm using. Legal charges can change based on legally classifying something as terrorism, but depending on the attack itself the response could be federal, state, or local. Or a mix.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.