After re-reading it a few times, with my antipathy for @nytimes and @maggieNYT turned down to the lowest setting, I can see how a certain kind of person in a certain frame of mind might interpret the first tweet as an accusation of gullibility and criticism of a core belief.
-
-
-
I can see that. And I think there’s value in reporting what people in the White House are saying. But skepticism isn’t partisan.
-
Indeed. I presume that's just how she justifies her style of reporting to herself so that she can sleep at night.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And that Maggie often simply transcribes the lies, perhaps to keep her “access”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.