The argument that 21st century US civilians need guns to prevent government tyranny—not have a right to bear arms, not want for self-protection, but need as anti-gov deterrence—sounds like something no one’s dumb enough to believe. And yet people keep saying it as if they do.
-
-
If you read Federalist 46, it is about taking up arms against a federal government, not the Brits. RKBA is a hedge against a regular army "entirely at the devotion of the federal government" http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed46.asp …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.