When the memo came out, I read it closely, and wrote an article evaluating it on its merits. And, though my article focused on analyzing Damore's arguments rather than evaluating his case, the LRB's interpretation strikes me as the most reasonable responsehttps://arcdigital.media/evaluating-the-google-gender-diversity-memo-on-the-merits-b73a86a5e6de …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Scientifically, the memo's biggest flaw: it cites research showing small differences between men and women in general to justify large disparities in tech employment and leadership But Google recruits from a small subset, not the general population, so that research doesn't apply
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Google HR in NLRB memo: “Having a different political view is absolutely fine. Advancing gender stereotypes is not.” Ruling empowers HR and the NLRB to determine what constitutes “gender stereotypes”, a concept as fluid as the NLRB itself and rooted more in politics than law
-
Fair point. But there might be no way around it. “Hostile work environment” is hard, if not impossible, to identify without some element of subjectivity, which is inherently fluid, at least in part.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good. Consequences for being a total dick, Damore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read the memo online, and it’s really inconclusive, and based on sketchy speculations. No intelligent being should jump on the right-wing news train to champion for that shit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.