Good thing 2016 focused on handling classified material Media covered it (and covered it), politicians debated it, and the American people spoke loud and clear: Carelessness unacceptable And lo! The government heard the message 'Twas never a problem againhttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/scores-top-white-house-officials-lack-permanent-security-clearances-n848191 …
-
Show this thread
-
That was snarky, so let me be serious: I cared about Hillary's carelessness with classified info. Not most important issue in the election, but concerning. Likely reason: dodging FOIA requests. Normal officials would've lost security clearance. But Trump admin so much worse.
2 replies 5 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Porter: violent abuser, vulnerable to blackmail. Kushner: debts to foreigners, not forthcoming about foreign contacts. Scavino, McGahn, Sanders, Ivanka, more: can't get (probably don't deserve) real security clearance but still have access to top secret info.
2 replies 15 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Anyone who claimed to care about Hillary's handling of classified info who isn't furious about Trump admin sharing TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) with people who can't get real clearance shows they were disingenuous, and don't care about US info sec (END)
8 replies 27 retweets 56 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Nicholas, we shall have many brown twitter babies together. And lo, they shall be smart AND sassy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
As long as they learn to say "and lo," I'm in.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.