That was snarky, so let me be serious: I cared about Hillary's carelessness with classified info. Not most important issue in the election, but concerning. Likely reason: dodging FOIA requests. Normal officials would've lost security clearance. But Trump admin so much worse.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Porter: violent abuser, vulnerable to blackmail. Kushner: debts to foreigners, not forthcoming about foreign contacts. Scavino, McGahn, Sanders, Ivanka, more: can't get (probably don't deserve) real security clearance but still have access to top secret info.
Show this thread -
Anyone who claimed to care about Hillary's handling of classified info who isn't furious about Trump admin sharing TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) with people who can't get real clearance shows they were disingenuous, and don't care about US info sec (END)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no such thing as a "permanent" security clearance. You can pass a final security clearance check that is not "interim", but is always subject to revocation. Just saying..... headline is B.S.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.