Still haven't heard any Iran Deal critic plausibly argue the Middle East would be better today if only Iran had nuclear weapons. Just naive fantasies that Russia and China would've continued sanctions forever, Iran was verging on collapse, or a few airstrikes would've solved it.
I know. But Iran having more money means its military and proxies get more money. That's a tradeoff that has to be factored into analysis of the nuclear deal.
-
-
Yes, Iran got their own funds and trade partners back for big concessions. An isolated Iran is much more dangerous IMO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.