That’s simultaneously criticizing the FBI for being too political and not political enough. Unless it’s not a criticism at all? Perhaps a lament, with hindsight, that things worked out this way? Because a legal counter-Intel org doing counter-intel legally is how it should work.
Interesting question, and impossible to fully answer without knowing everything the FBI knew. Potentially, Steele provided some info that matched other sources, and some that didn't. The former makes the latter worth investigating. But why not use only other sources? Don't know.
-
-
Haven't seen definitively the role the dossier has had in Mueller's investigation. If anything, the GPS assessment pre-Clinton involvement is more damaging. Per the House testimony from Simpson, Deutsche bank, money laundering w Oligarchs & Real Estate deals w shell companies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.