Is it normal disclose that someone was and continues to be under electronic surveillance authorized under FISA? Seems like disclosure of sources and methods to me.
-
-
Replying to @LesserFrederick
How? At worst, it's confirmation of things that were already public knowledge. The basics of the FISA process, Page under surveillance, Steele dossier, Papadopoulos info started investigation--all known.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @epicciuto @LesserFrederick
I guess. But it was so widely believed already, and no new sources or methods were revealed. Hard to see that as serious damage.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81 @epicciuto
It creates a precedent to confirm or deny leaks about FISA surveillance. Maybe not a big deal in this case, but with no benefit to releasing the information, even a lesser harm should have been enough.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @LesserFrederick @epicciuto
Fair point.
12:22 PM - 2 Feb 2018
from New York, USA
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.