I enjoy your tweets much more when you engage on policy. Political twitter isn't for everybody.
-
-
-
Meaning you like it more when I write about policy than about politics? Me too. I like thinking about policy a lot more. But political twitter can get awfully loud, sometimes about really shallow stuff, and has a way of sucking you in. And these days they overlap in weird ways.
-
Your policy stuff is interesting and why I follow you despite often disagreeing. But politics is a different world. Ellen knows there are costs to the bill, I'm certain she sees and regrets the flaws. She's fairly reacting to partisan messaging that gained A LOT of traction.
-
Anyone saying the bill has no benefits is being ridiculous But many arguing in its favor tout a relatively small benefit as if that, in isolation, is reason to be happy with it Maybe I'm just frustrated that so much of the political discussion shouts rather than rationally argues
-
Im old enough to remember articles saying reducing the alcohol tax would kill thousands, that the GOP bill wouldn't do anything for the middle class. They even wrote articles with numbers, like "Cindy making
$x will get only $32, while Bill Gates will get $3.6million" -
Or people responsible for raising spending and absolutely ballooning the deficit wail about the debt impact. It's all theatre. The policy is harder and not sexy enough for talking heads, twitters, or voters.
-
Yeah. There are stupid and/or hyperbolic arguments out there about everything. I wish the public discussion could be more "I see some upsides, but I think they're outweighed by the downsides because X, Y, Z" and less "YOU'RE GOING TO KILL US!" But no idea how to make that happen.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.