And US is free to take names and pull funding from the theocrats and authoritarians you're such a big fan of (seriously, I wish people could just focus.)
-
-
-
I'm a fan of what now? The US could pull funding from the big recipients (Afghanistan, Israel, Iraq, Egypt, Jordan). Or from theocratic authoritarians like the Saudis. Those countries (except Israel) voted against the US. But the money's not a favor. It advances US interests.
-
Please point out where I say UN vote today was binding.
-
You didn't say the UN vote is binding, but you did say the "UN attempts to dictate." They can't dictate anything and they know it. No reason to over-inflate their importance.
-
So I didn't say what you claimed. My bad, tho. I assumed you understood how Twitter worked. That comment was in reaction to someone who was comparing Haley to Joe McCarthy.
-
You said "UN attempts to dictate..." and I responded with "The UN can't dictate anything to the US." But yeah, comparing Haley to McCarthy is ridiculous. "You know who else put people on a list? Hitler!" (If you're going there, might as well go all the way).
-
The UN can "attempt to dictate" through international pressure. That's the point. I was just pointing out that yr snarky "non-binding" comment was irrelevant to my tweet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, they can’t. But
@nikkihaley saying that this was “ the will of the American people” was total bullshit, too. As was “ we’re taking names”. What are we, in middle school?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.