(THREAD) 1) Investigate Trump-Russia. Determine if anyone broke the law. 2) Investigate the FBI. Determine if anyone has a political belief Fox News wouldn't like. Crime vs. Thoughtcrime.
-
-
The FBI publicly drew attention to its investigation into Hillary's emails shortly before the election, while keeping quiet about its investigation into Trump's ties to Russia. If that was a conspiracy to help Hillary win, it was awfully confused. 4/x
Show this thread -
Stewart Baker, a lawyer who served as Assistant Secretary for Policy in the Department of Homeland Security under George W. Bush, provides a good explanation of why Strzok’s "insurance policy" text is not at all evidence of a conspiracy here: 5/xhttps://www.lawfareblog.com/peter-strzoks-insurance-policy …
Show this thread -
It turns out Strzok also texted that Bernie Sanders is "an idiot" and “I’m worried about what happens if HRC is elected.” And, it bears repeating, these are private text messages. Privately sharing an opinion isn't a crime. Thankfully. 6/x
Show this thread -
Strzok was removed from the Mueller investigation over the summer, which was the right decision, because appearance of impartiality is important to any law enforcement effort. 7/x
Show this thread -
And oversight of law enforcement and intelligence agencies is crucial. There are many cases in US history where officials have abused their power. Privately expressing opinions isn't one of them. However, DOJ selectively publicizing private text messages might be. 8/x
Show this thread -
What's clear is the people trying to make a big deal out of Strzok's private opinions aren't motivated by the rule of law, oversight, the integrity of law enforcement, or other laudable concerns. Quite the opposite. They're trying to undermine the rule of law. 9/x
Show this thread -
Two Trump officials confessed to felonies. Two others are under indictment. Anyone charged is innocent until proven guilty. But publicly available information indicates there's likely enough evidence to bring charges against others. Trump loyalists are right to be nervous. 10/x
Show this thread -
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.” Yelling about one FBI agent's private political opinions is an especially desperate table pounding. (END)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's also the "activate the plan McCabe talked about in his office" line. It's certainly enough smoke to warrant checking in detail for fire
-
As normal oversight, absolutely. Like I said, that's crucial to the proper functioning of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. But oversight is very different from trying to convince the public to dismiss evidence of criminal activity.
-
Agreed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As far as I am concerned this is a scandal on the right not the left Releasing these emails goes against all precedent and is further evidence of a conspiracy to obstruct justice by derailing a legitimate investigation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The
@GOP &@realDonaldTrump can't seem to accept that Hillary lost; she is not in office. It must be they are doing such a terrible job governing they wish they had her help!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.