(THREAD) Epic screw-up in the tax bill the Senate just passed. They lowered the corporate rate to 20%, but accidentally put in an alternative minimum tax (AMT) of 20%. That's right. The same rate. (Maybe rushing it through wasn't the best idea). Here are some implications:
-
-
But companies are pissed. Especially well-connected companies that got the government to give them special tax breaks. Real tax reform is a great idea. But that wasn't Republicans' main goal. Now the bill doesn't funnel nearly as much money to rich people as they thought. 3/x
Show this thread -
That means the Senate has to pass another tax bill. Lower the corporate rate *and* makes sure they can keep their tax breaks. Of course, they could roll with real tax reform instead. That would help the countr-- ah, who am I kidding? 4/x
Show this thread -
It wasn't easy to sneak the tax bill through the Senate. They had to refuse hearings and expert testimony, make changes by hand, and pass it quickly. For comparison, Obamacare took over a year, left months between committee and floor votes, and had 44 Senate hearings. 5/x
Show this thread -
To send a bill to the president, House and Senate must pass identical versions. Republicans could have avoided the gamble of putting up another bill for a Senate vote by having the House pass the Senate version. That's what Democrats did with Obamacare after Ted Kennedy died. 6/x
Show this thread -
But the epic screw-up--reinstating an AMT but accidentally making it the same as the normal rate--means the House can't pass the Senate version. Well, they could. But then it wouldn't funnel as much money to people with a lot of money. Plus there are other, lesser screw-ups. 7/x
Show this thread -
There's going to be another Senate vote on the tax bill. Republicans could write a better bill. Maybe something like Reagan's 1986 bipartisan tax reform. If not, Americans who disagree with Republicans' current approach to taxes have another shot to stop them. 8/x
Show this thread -
Meanwhile, government funding is almost out. Because some Republicans won't vote for a spending bill without large cuts first, avoiding a shutdown requires Democratic votes. That gives Democrats leverage. And a shutdown means no votes on normal business, including tax bills. 9/x
Show this thread -
In trying to rush their overhaul of the tax system, Senate Republicans accidentally passed something that angers, rather than pleases many of their donors. They almost certainly won't be able to pass something this year. If you want to fight about it, you've still got time. (END)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Could one argue in court that the AMT should be struck from the law because it is an obvious mistake? That Congress clearly intended the deductions to be available?
-
I doubt that would be successful. Congress has to set the rates. A court can’t guess what number Congress meant to use instead of the one they wrote in the bill (not least because the Senators who passed it haven’t figured it out yet).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We know life in a banana republic now! The paid lobbyists calling themselves Republicans, have compromised the software in our electronic voting systems! Paper Voting Ballots are the answer if Democrats ever hope to win, honest and fair elections! Paper Voting Ballots!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.