(THREAD) The Don Jr.-Wikileaks DMs read like a media organization promoting its published material, trying to ingratiate itself to a campaign, and asking for favors (unsuccessfully). Nothing more. That's not defending Don Jr or Wikileaks. It's defending objectivity.
-
-
But one can be charged w/ receiving stolen property even when received from 3rd party. I’m not sure your reasoning holds. Isn’t it down to knowledge or good/bad faith?
-
And the other evidence
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are looking at this in isolation-as part of larger web of evidence, re: Russian involvement in WikiLeaks it’s another piece>to collusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.