I read the Don Jr.-Wikileaks correspondence, and don't see anything incriminating. No coordination of strategy. No sharing of stolen information. Certainly nothing like his "I love it" eagerness to accept help from the Russian government.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/ …
-
-
I’d agree, but it’s surprisingly hard to avoid compartmentalizing as we get one bit of evidence at a time out of sequence, and he’s testified under oath about activity during the election. Have to be irritating & say for me it’s undecided, in the broader sense of “incriminating.”
-
I place immense value on evidence-based reasoning. Doing so has even more value if our society is moving away from that principle.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.