What's your alternative interpretation of documented evidence setting up meetings in Russia and saying they're approved by Trump campaign?
Those aren't mutually exclusive. Many people wanted Trump, and Russia actively interfered in the election. There's tons of evidence for both
-
-
And they want to prevent that, just like the US wants to prevent foreign interference in its elections. Do you disagree? Should US allow it?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I linked to Trump campaign official's emails setting up Russia meetings as evidence of them working together. You disputed that. Why?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sorry, could you clarify? Are you: A) indifferent to a campaign colluding with a foreign power B) saying those emails aren't evidence of A
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.