Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason. Banning one thing in no way requires banning others. (I favor this ban, oppose many others).
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
Either way. You still didn't answer my question. If it changes absolutely nothing, why ban it? Just to feel good about yourself?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Many (including the LV shooter) disagree with the claim that it does nothing. Ban to make it harder for people like him to shoot as fast.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Ignorant people that have never used one or don't know anything about guns disagree
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Why do you think LV shooter used bump stock then?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Who knows, maybe he just happened to have it. And really, at 350~ yards, regular semi auto would have been more effective.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattDehn89
More accurate yes, but not an issue when firing into large dense crowd. He installed the stock onto multiple rifles. He thought they helped.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
The only thing passing more laws will do is restrict good, law abiding citizens who aren't going to go out and murder people to begin with
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I have to go teach, and will leave you the last word. Thanks for chatting. Conversations on this topic should be more like this one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.