That's a skill. It helps less skilled. Your argument's a good reason why no one should oppose a ban. Won't solve much. But won't hurt either
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
It's not a skill... You pull the gun forward while keeping your trigger finger stationary. Literally any idiot can do it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Evidently not, based on how many have sold and how LV shooter outfitted multiple rifles. Regardless, you're still making the case for a ban
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Im pointing out how pointless a ban is and, as its the only shooting involving one, would solve nothing and wouldnt have changed the outcome
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Would have slowed this particular shooters rate of fire, giving people a little more time to disperse and seek cover.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
False. I literally just said any idiot can do it without the stock. With or without it, the outcome wouldn't have changed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Okay, if it doesn't do anything, why do you have a problem with banning it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
If it doesnt change anything, why ban it? Its just one more step toward banning other things or types of guns.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MattDehn89
Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason. Banning one thing in no way requires banning others. (I favor this ban, oppose many others).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
And when they ban this, they'll go after something else then. Even if it is a "falacy"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If they do, and it's a bad idea, I and many others will disagree and they'll fail.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.