Full auto: illegal
Semi-auto: legal
Bump stock (makes semi-auto fire like auto): legal
Why?
No bump stock, probably fewer dead in #LasVegas
That's a skill. It helps less skilled. Your argument's a good reason why no one should oppose a ban. Won't solve much. But won't hurt either
-
-
It's not a skill... You pull the gun forward while keeping your trigger finger stationary. Literally any idiot can do it.
-
Evidently not, based on how many have sold and how LV shooter outfitted multiple rifles. Regardless, you're still making the case for a ban
-
Im pointing out how pointless a ban is and, as its the only shooting involving one, would solve nothing and wouldnt have changed the outcome
-
Would have slowed this particular shooters rate of fire, giving people a little more time to disperse and seek cover.
-
False. I literally just said any idiot can do it without the stock. With or without it, the outcome wouldn't have changed
-
Okay, if it doesn't do anything, why do you have a problem with banning it?
-
If it doesnt change anything, why ban it? Its just one more step toward banning other things or types of guns.
-
Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason. Banning one thing in no way requires banning others. (I favor this ban, oppose many others).
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or do it either way.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Not to blame. Made a little bit worse than otherwise would have been. You know we restrict strength of publicly available explosives, right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.