The biggest advantage of Chicago gun laws isn't preventing guns coming in from out of state. It's arresting/prosecuting gang members 9/x
-
Show this thread
-
Much easier to arrest someone and convict them on a firearms charge than on something ambiguous, like belonging to a gang. 10/x
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likesShow this thread -
And smarter, larger gangs separate the jobs of drug dealer and enforcer. Cops can't arrest the violent members on drug possession. 11/x
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Most gun control proposals prompted by mass shootings wouldn't do anything to stop Chicago gangs from getting weapons. 12/x
4 replies 3 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
They mostly do not use AR-15s, or other civilian versions of military-grade rifles. 13/x
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
"Assault weapon" is very hard to define. And pretty easy to get around. Either way, a new assault weapons ban wouldn't help Chicago. 14/x
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Expanded background checks and closing gun show loopholes could help. Make it harder for gang to send 1 or 2 people to buy out of state 15/x
2 replies 4 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
But gang violence is a multifaceted problem. Unclear how much stricter gun laws would help. Definitely wouldn't solve all of it. 16/x
1 reply 4 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
But one thing's clear: Gun violence in Chicago tells us absolutely nothing about how national gun laws might affect America as a whole (END)
6 replies 7 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NGrossman81
Great thread! Good info to refute the "But Chicago" gun control naysayers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Thank you. Guns are a complex issue, and there are many arguments that have merit. However, "but Chicago" isn't one of them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.