If I thought that I would have written it. But I don't. So I didn't.
-
-
Replying to @NGrossman81
So if you agree that is illegal, and the executive should be constrained by laws, why support DACA? Support a cong.solution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @craigsuperstar
Nicholas Grossman Retweeted Nicholas Grossman
I do support a legislative solution. But I'm skeptical Congress will find one, and see no reason to sow chaos first.https://twitter.com/NGrossman81/status/905210121223114752 …
Nicholas Grossman added,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
I suspect that this is the reason for six month buffer. No other real reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @craigsuperstar
Attempt to duck criticism/blame Congress while pleasing hardliners. I doubt they'll pass a comprehensive bill. But I'd love to be wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NGrossman81
If T didn't cancel, eventually a court would have ended it and there would be an immediate mess. This is actually the least Trumpian out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @craigsuperstar
Responsible would be studying the issue, consulting Congress, and preparing legislation first. No sign the administration's done any of that
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @craigsuperstar
Some conversations between a Senator and Jared Kushner that produced nothing does not qualify as preparing legislation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NGrossman81
"consulting congress...no sign the administration's done any of that"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Okay, fair point. There's a sign the administration did a little of that, but not in a way that produced a path forward. I stand corrected.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.