No. Tom Price won by 23%. Handel won by 4%. This is major erosion. This is a victory disguised as defeat. Handel's team also spent /1
-
-
-
No, its not. Price was an incumbent whose last few opponents were only place holders. Ossaff was far better funded and Handel still won.
-
Handel had backing that outpriced Ossoff's by 250%. Love you but please recognize a win disguised as a loss. Erosion happened.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True. But will keep fighting. Nonethless. Well done to Karen Handel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sting and hurt , for a long time. The next seventeen months, perhaps .

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.