Fairly written. I'm not there yet on some of your points or conclusions, but I appreciate that it appears you've tried to work your way forward through analysis - not simply work your way back from pre-desired outcome - and that you aren't unilateral in your criticisms.
-
-
-
Thanks, I appreciate that. That's what I was going for.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why were the Senators asking the nominee to call for the FBI Investigation? That makes no sense. It made the Senate J.C. seem reliant on the nominee.
-
Because the president needed to request it, and they thought it would either strengthen their case for an investigation or make Kavanaugh look like he was hiding something by not calling for an investigation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
After all this, Is anyone asking whether he should be considered fit to serve on his present job: DC Court of Appeals?
-
I don't believe there's sufficient evidence to remove him. That's a punishment, different from not getting elevated to the Supreme Court. It should require a higher standard of proof. If corroborative evidence emerges, perhaps.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1/ There’s sufficient evidence to undercut your idea that boofing wasn’t a reference to farting. I posted some of that on my Twitter page
-
Regarding Devil’s Triangle, the earliest reference to it being slang for 3some is a 10 year old Urban Dictionary post. I’ve done Google ngram searches, I’ve done internet searches, etc. Can’t find references. I think your theory demands K and friends were 30 yrs ahead. Unlikely.
-
3/ See the thread by the ND law prof. on Ford’s therapist notes: saying 4 guy’s did this in the MID 80s in her LATE teens. She now saying all of that wrong.
-
4/ instead she wants everybody to focus on swing Judge at Safeway. She brought it up 5–FIVE—times in hearing, even at odd times. She keeps wanting us to focus on her seeing Judge 6-8 weeks later at Safeway. Judge wrote in his book he worked at Safeway in summer of 82.
-
5/ Very easily could have found that jn Judge’s book, then made changes to her “therapists” notes, which we don’t have. So she then crossed out “late” on her lie detector summary when it originally had “late.”
-
6/ Why don’t we have all the notes? Why won’t she hand them over? Why are they sooooo contradictory to her story now (Kav not even named. Why not? It’s in therapy). FBI needs to get those notes.
-
7/ So I *think* all you’ve got left is “Renate alumnis” and given that you don’t have good evidence at all to say he’s lying about boofing and Devil’s Triangle, you should afford him charity on that.
-
8/ This is on top of the really unlikely position your view commits you to, viz., he’s an evil, deranged moral monster AT THIS TIME. (Oh btw, how many serial gang rapers did you know in college who reformed themselves and became good citizens? lol)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed with your article. There are many reasons outside this episode to ask why stick with such a flawed candidate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Blasey Ford is a stooge or plant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. You are fake news.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.