In my article, I was primarily thinking from a national perspective. Risks of damaging SCOTUS legitimacy, risks he’s subject to blackmail, etc. Other possible noms don’t have those. If you mean risks GOP don’t get a justice, it’s small if they act fast, and I care less about that
That's fair. I meant the NatSec comparison as an analogy, not an identical comparison.
-
-
And, just in case you don't know, we're happy to publish stuff in Arc that disagrees with one of the editors (provided it meets the usual standards of reason, evidence, and quality, of course).
-
Yes, I saw that with the recent relativism piece :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.