i've never understood how i've seen people who have written that it was okay to stonewall all of HRC's nominees in the Federalist now think it's horrible that the Dems are doing to them what they wanted to do in the first place
-
-
-
Because they can't see beyond the partisan fight. If it helps "your side" it's good, if it helps the "other side," it's bad. Rationalizations follow.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They don't care if they delegitimize the courts. As long as a judge will enforce their dark vision of America, that's good enough for the
@GOP.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's going to be Amy Dems better vote for senators in massive numbers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Garland's move was extreme bs. My dyed in the wool never voted Democrat 72 year old father thought that was BS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or Garland, and then we’re even steven. He votes w Kavanaugh 90% of the time, FFS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gorsuch might have been personally clean, but he’s always going to be connected to Garland.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm finding these arguments more persuasive everyday.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Diane Sykes. She's right there, and a woman which would be a big boost with a voter base you are losing badly. I don't understand the GOP purely from a strategy stand point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.